Interdisciplinary IAD Module Fall 2020 in cooperation with Stage Design
Instructors
IAD:
Joëlle Bitton
DDK:
Manuel Fabritz
Guest lecturers:
The module takes place over 3 weeks, from 01.12.2020 to 18.12.2020 from Tuesday to Friday, 9.30-17.00 (unless noted otherwise) in room 3.C06 Inszenatorikraum - see timetable below for detailed hours.
Overview and Objectives: Hacking Values
The course is an interdisciplinary collaboration between Interaction Design, Stage Design, Art and Art Education.
Within the topic “ecologies”, we discuss our environment and the ways we engage with powers and systems that surround us.
We propose to frame that with the term of “hacking”.
Hacking
With “Hacking”, we do not (only) mean the popular meaning of "hacking into computer systems".
The term also means messing about with something in a positive sense, that is, using playful cleverness to achieve a goal.
Hacking can also manipulates or alienates a system, an object, etc. for specific purposes.
Thus "Hacking values" can be understood as a method to recognize and understand systems and structures of power, but also possibly to challenge their authority.
From "life hacks", necessity-based "bricolage", such as Jugaad in India (see other terms in different countries*) to art-based and political-based targeted disruptions, "hacking" could be considered as a form of activism, akin to notions of resistance, disobedience, and subversion, especially as we refer here to "values".
As such, finding affordable or personal solutions, going around established systems, repairing or subverting an object's use could be ways of gaining or regaining autonomy, gaining or regaining meaning, etc. The hacks themselves often have a playful quality to them that underlines that those forms of resistance are mostly physically non-confrontational and non-violent.
Forms of hacking can also include statements of living and thriving within subcultures, forms of art and performance (ie. drag culture), taking counter hetero-normative and counter patriarchical actions (such as not being referred to with a gender-based pronoun).
Finally, adopting and embracing failure, cracks, oddness and uncanniness could constitute again other forms of hacking, and be notably expressed with art, design and craft (see Kintsugi art for instance).
...
*"Jugaad roughly corresponds to do-it-yourself (DIY) in the US, hacking in the UK, tapullo in Italy, zìzhǔ chuàngxīn (自主创新) in China, Trick 17 in Germany, gambiarra in Brazil, système D. in France,
or jua kali in Kenya; in addition, equivalent words within South Africa are ’n boer maak ’n plan in Afrikaans, izenzele in Zulu, iketsetse in Sotho and itirele in Tswana.[6]" [Wikipedia, Jugaad article, accessed 10.09.2018].
Structure
The course is structured with lectures, discussions, mentoring sessions, independent study blocks, as well as exercises showcasing methods from various disciplines (interaction design, art, art education & theatre).
Objectives of the course
- Projects are conducted in an interdisciplinary team of 3-4 students.
- Methods from various disciplines are proposed and experimented with.
- Awareness of values and possible ways of challenging them
- Hack of chosen system
- The final outcome could be a performance, a public space installation, an intervention or another format that demonstrates or simulates a system being hacked.
Methods
Through a set of lectures and exercises, we will look at hacking values of the political space, of the material environment, of the personal space, and of the body.
Here are some of the possible methods we'll use, from a range of different disciplines:
...
Dancing Exercise
In this method, we see performance as an anchor point in hacking values. Like William Forsythe, who's basic idea is taking ballet as a language with its own vocabulary and rules, to break it and bend it, we will take geometries like of classic dance to be twisted, tilt or pulled out of a line. We would like to mess with social conventions. We do not act "properly", like dancing in a discussion or talking in a dancing piece. Dancing becomes a method of investigation like Forsythe was remarking "I think by dancing I was able to understand a lot of things. I was able to intuit things about mathematics and philosophy … "(BBC Radio 3 2003, interview with John Tusa) So how do we understand the patterns of social dynamics around us and how do we stretch and break it apart to gain a better understanding?
link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Forsythe_(choreographer)
link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/27/arts/design/the-shed-new-york-prelude.html
Bodystorming
Bodystorming is an improvisational brainstorm based on interaction and movement with the body. To remind participants that interactions are human and physical, to teach stakeholders empathy for users, and to get away from our computers. "Bodystorming is useful when you are designing devices or interior or exterior spaces. For example, you might use bodystorming to understand how users of different heights and ages would experience different versions of aircraft cabins (for example, what are the problems with lifting luggage in crowded planes from the floor to the overhead bins), or the layout of modern train cars. Bodystorming can be quite useful in understanding the experience of teams who work in close quarters like doctors and nurses in an operating room or the cooking staff in a restaurant. Bodystorming is a way to envision how people will interact with ubiquitous computing systems like smart homes and virtual meeting spaces." (Design Research at Autodesk)
link: Bodystorming as embodied Designing (ACM)
Assignments
Exercice 03 - Strollology - Methods for the photographic excursion (proposed by Andreas Kohli)
...
- A picture which does not represent to the place
- The classic postcard
- An irritating place
- A photograph that provokes false assumptions
- A picture that shows a problem
- A situation: coincidence or intention?
- A photo taken at the wrong moment
- A place for a street art intervention
- The photo I wouldn't actually take
- Manipulated / not manipulated
Expectations and Gradings
Grades will be based on group presentations and exercises, class participation, documentation (journal) and final work.
Contributing to constructive group feedback is an essential aspect of class participation.
Regular attendance is required. Two or more unexcused absences will affect the final grade. Arriving late on more than one occasion will also affect the grade.
...
Any assignment that remains unfulfilled receives a failing grade.
Deliverables
- Final Work: The format of the final outcome is up to the students. It could be: a performance, a prototype, a movie, an installation, a graphic work, an intervention, etc. It needs to be in adequation with the intention and the process.
- On-going online documentation in the form of a journal containing photos, recordings, text of the process (choice of online format is free).
- A final documentation package should include a 1mn video, 5-7 high quality photos and a short text.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Name of Lecturers in brackets {} jb: Joëlle Bitton, mf: Manuel Fabritz, ak: Andreas Kohli, yl: Yatin Lin
Week 1 - Values | Tu. 1.12 | We 2.12 | Th. 3.12 | Fr. 4.12 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Morning | Intro session
Exercise 01
| Discussion on topics that students want to pursue in their projects - what do you want to hack? (making groups)
| Independent study | Independent study |
Afternoon | 13.00 - 14.00
14.00 - 16.00 Input+Exercise 02
| Exercise 03
|
Exercise 04
Assignment
| |
Classroom | 3.C06 | 3.C06 | 3.C06 | 3.C06 |
Week 2 - Actions | Tu. 8.12 | We. 9.12 | Th. 10.12 | Fr. 11.12 |
Morning |
Input
|
| Mentoring - Advanced Prototype - mentoring takes place in working stations | Independent study |
Afternoon | Exercise 05
| Independent study | Independent study | Mid-Presentation - Advanced Prototypes |
Classroom | 3.C06 | 3.C06 | 3.C06 | 3.C06 |
Week 3 - Restitution | Tu. 15.12 | We. 16.12 | Th. 17.12 | Fr. 18.12 |
8Mo. 17.12 | 09.00 - 12.00 | Independent study | Final Documentation | |
Independent study | 14.00 - 16.00 +Course Feedback discussion | |||
3.C06 | 3.C06 | 3.C06 | 3.C06 |
Teams
Literature/References
- Links from Andreas Kohli lecture
- Thomas Düllo,Franz Liebl (Hg.)
Cultural hacking : Kunst des strategischen Handelns
isbn: 9783211232781
Springer Verlag Wien, 2005 - Systeme erkennen:
Supermarket:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQYhRzt_8Fs
Social media:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfXgRFDI5CY
Wilderness:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hfz76qSKx4
Theorie
Niklas Luhmann
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=143IZxZF1WE - Choreography:
William Forsythe:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAEBD630ACCB6AD45
Trisha Brown:
https://youtu.be/9dAvQstiVqA
...