...
Update the chatGPT key file (this will be provided by email).
Modify the parameters to reflect your own views. Include views on topics you discussed in the first days of the course I.E. those relating to public space, technology and democracy.
Start conversing with the twin and modify the parameters to improve the results.
Test your twin with 3 difficult questions.
Save/document the chatGPT key fileyour modifications to the example from Github, the questions and the chat that you developed on the server : (@ smb://fileredu.ad.zhdk.ch/DDE/BDE_VIAD/01_ABGABEN/24_FS/Sem4_Spatial_Interaction/Individual/YOUR_NAME/.
Task 2 (group) Developing a democratic discourse with Digital Twins.
Within your group, think up a scenario or situation where you can incorporate your digital twins into choosing a concept for your group's main assignment. Attempt to play out the situation with your whole group and record the results with a short video (max 5 minutes).
Were the decisions consistent with your views? Did you think about your own views differently after the experiment: did you discover inconsistencies or biases of your own that you were not aware of? Did the exercise influence your decision-making regarding the main concept, or was it a distraction?
Save/document the prompts and the chat that you developed on the server @ smb://fileredu.ad.zhdk.ch/DDE/BDE_VIAD/01_ABGABEN/24_FS/Sem4_Spatial_Interaction/Group/GROUP_NAMES/.
Tips:
Consider using an Expert/Tree of thought prompt and modify parameters to your needs:
“Imagine three different experts are answering this question. They will brainstorm the answer step by step, reasoning carefully and taking all facts into consideration. All experts will write down 1 step of their thinking, then share it with the group. They will each critique their response and all the responses of others. They will check their answer based on science and the laws of physics. Then all experts will go on to the next step and write down this step of their thinking. They will keep going through steps until they reach their conclusion taking into account the thoughts of the other experts. If at any time they realise that there is a flaw in their logic they will backtrack to where that flaw occurred. If any expert realises they're wrong at any point then they acknowledge this and start another tree of thought. Each expert will assign a likelihood of their current assertion being correct. Continue until the experts agree on the single most likely location. The question is… (add question)”