Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Confluence
For you

Bachelor Thesis
Results will update as you type.
  • Thesis disposition and creative statement
  • Exhibition guidelines
  • Presentation guidelines  
  • Archive (BA Thesis Document Structure and Criteria)
  • Thesis Document Structure and Criteria
  • Final Project Criteria and Grading
  • Bachelor Thesis 2018
  • Bachelor Thesis 2019
  • Bachelor Thesis 2020
  • Bachelor Thesis 2021
  • ConceptSeminar
  • Free Flow

/
Final Project Criteria and Grading

Final Project Criteria and Grading

Dec 12, 2019

Analytics

Loading data...

The official study guidelines of the BA in Design at ZHdK provides broad lines for the diploma evaluation (see § 15).

The BA thesis is composed of two aspects:
- the BA project, with a process, outcome and findings presented and exhibited counts for 22 ECTS points.
- the BA written work and documentation counts for 6 ECTS points (including a discussion during the thesis colloquium) and the criteria are listed here.

Another criteria for getting your diploma is a full project documentation (incl. images, texts, video, prototype, etc.) on the ZHdK-server. Guidelines are the same as for other projects in the IAD. Please be aware that we can not hand out a diploma to those who do not completely fulfill this requirements. For details, please have a look here: Project Documentation.

The criteria for the BA project are :

  • Project (50%)
    Generosity: How the research was conducted with ambition, commitment and responsibilty.
    Relevance: Relevance of the topic for the design community, society, design discourse.
    Execution: How diligently, creatively, precisely the outcome is showcased.
    Academic Position: Evaluating the maturity of the position within the research discourse. 
    Transversality: Considering the different fields in which the project can have an impact. 
  • Final presentation (25%)
    Ability for Synthesis 
    Range of Overview given
    Addressing questions asked

  • Mediation via exhibition (25%)
    Quality
    Precision

The grade is decided after each mentoring team provides their assessment (the student mentors provide a consultory assessment) and a discussion leads to a consensus.
The two external guests provide their assessment for the project itself and for the mediation via exhibition.

Additional criteria: 
Depending on the angle undertaken for the project, some aspects will be particularly relevant: ie. interface design for apps and platforms, methodology for field studies, evaluation for education services, etc..

Grading details:

A hervorragend (6) = ausgezeichnete, hervorragende Leistung 
B sehr gut (5-6) = deutlich überdurchschnittliche Leistung 
C gut (5) = insgesamt gute und solide Arbeit 
D befriedigend (4-5) = mittelmäßige Arbeit 
E ausreichend (4) = Leistungen entsprechen den Mindestanforderungen 
FX nicht bestanden (3,5) = es sind Nachbesserungen erforderlich 
F klar nicht bestanden (<3,5) 
Abstufungen: 3 = ungenügend, 2 = schwach, 1 = sehr schwach bzw. keine Arbeit geleistet – die Arbeit ist zu wiederholen, in der Regel keine Nachbesserung möglich.

, multiple selections available,
Related content
Grading Scale and Evaluation Criteria
Grading Scale and Evaluation Criteria
Verena Ziegler
Curriculum Structure and Credits
Curriculum Structure and Credits
Verena Ziegler
Thesis Document Structure and Criteria
Thesis Document Structure and Criteria
Joëlle Bitton
Project Documentation
Project Documentation
Luke Franzke
Archive (BA Thesis Document Structure and Criteria)
Archive (BA Thesis Document Structure and Criteria)
Joëlle Bitton
BA Thesis Concept Seminar 2025
BA Thesis Concept Seminar 2025
Joëlle Bitton
{"serverDuration": 13, "requestCorrelationId": "66efd1f6d3404049a4b00ac36c11e3d5"}