Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Confluence
For you

Student Handbook
Results will update as you type.
  • Awards and Exhibitions
  • BA / MA theses (draft)
  • Campus Card and Other Affairs
  • Career excursion
  • Confirmation of Studies
  • Copyrights and Licencing (Use of sound/music, other files)
  • Curriculum Structure and Credits
  • Discovery Space
  • Ethics guidelines
  • Exchanges, Interruption of Studies, Withdrawal
  • Exhibition Tips
  • Expenses & Reimbursement
  • FIBI
  • Grading Scale and Evaluation Criteria
  • IAD Team
  • Library at a glance - MIZ
  • Literature Interaction Design
  • Military and Civil Service: Deferral Requests
  • Opportunities on campus and at IAD
  • Plagiarism
  • Project Documentation
  • Project Documentation via the Media Archive
  • Social Media
  • Student Responsibilities
  • Tuition Fees
  • Visa for foreign students
  • Communication issues with courses
  • IAD Insight Sessions
  • Semester Dates

/
Grading Scale and Evaluation Criteria

Grading Scale and Evaluation Criteria

Jul 03, 2018

Analytics

Loading data...

Grading Scale

Based on the “General Regulations for Students at Zurich University of the Arts” (enacted on 18 December 2017), student performance is graded as follows: 

AOutstanding (6): distinguished performance
BVery good (5.5): above-average performance
CGood (5): good and solid overall performance
DSatisfactory (4.5): average performance
ESufficient (4): performance satisfies minimum requirements
FXFail (3.5):
 some rework is required (up to one year for resubmission of work)
FClear fail / 
 Gradation: 3 = insufficient, 2 = weak, 1 = very weak, i.e., no work done, absent student or plagiarised work — no rework possible as a rule.

The predicate “With distinction” is awarded to students whose performance has received a Grade A or a 5.75 and more.

Repeated absences and lateness will impact your grade.

Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation criteria consist of five components:

  1. Regular and punctual attendance (at least 80% of all classes; students who fail to meet this requirement will automatically “fail” the respective course/seminar/module).
  2. Active participation in classwork and coming to classes prepared.
  3. Fulfilling Assignments (In-class and final) 
  4. Timely submission of complete course assignments/projects etc.
  5. Providing project documentations.

Viewing Grades Online

Students may view their grades online: https://www.zhdk.ch/?meinebewertungen.

Plagiarism

Students shown to have plagiarised work (either from other students, or copied text or copied projects) will get a failing grade in the first case, and if it happens a second time, they will go through a reviewing commission that will decide on their status as a student of the IAD BA program.
The Interaction Design Programme considers plagiarism to constitute the violation of any intellectual, visual, or acoustic property pertaining to the copyrighted pictorial-, video-, and sound material created by any third party. Plagiarism also includes the unauthorised use of any scientific findings, hypotheses, teachings, or research approaches under presumption of authorship.  


, multiple selections available,

Related content

Final Project Criteria and Grading
Final Project Criteria and Grading
Bachelor Thesis
More like this
Student Handbook
Student Handbook
Student Handbook
More like this
Curriculum Structure and Credits
Curriculum Structure and Credits
Student Handbook
More like this
Semester Dates 2022-23
Semester Dates 2022-23
Student Handbook
More like this
Semester Dates
Semester Dates
Student Handbook
More like this
Thesis Theory/Practice 3
Thesis Theory/Practice 3
Thesis Theory/Practice 3
More like this
{"serverDuration": 42, "requestCorrelationId": "707e2fc337d04045b33539736450e5c9"}